The Difference Between Void and Voidable Contracts

Home / Blog / Contract Disputes / The Difference Between Void and Voidable Contracts
The Difference Between Void and Voidable Contracts

Essentially, the difference between void and voidable contracts is enforceability: a void contract is illegal and unenforceable; a voidable contract is legal and enforceable.

Void contracts

A contract that is void is unenforceable, meaning that neither party has legal recourse against the other for a breach. A contract can be void from the beginning or become void due to certain circumstances, including:

  • It involves illegal activity
  • It is against public policy
  • It is impossible to perform
  • It involves a party who is not legally competent

A contract may be valid when it is executed, but later become void due to changes in the law or the circumstances of either party make fulfilling the contract impossible. Some issues will make a contract “void on its face,” meaning that the contract as written is void and cannot be amended to make it enforceable.

Voidable contracts

A voidable contract is a valid agreement between two parties where usually only one of the parties is bound to the contract terms. A voidable contract can still be performed under the law; however, one party has the option to cancel the contract if the contract has one or more legal defects, such as:

  • Fraud or misrepresentation
  • Terms are unconscionable
  • Duress or undue influence
  • Mutual mistake

If defects are found in the contract, a party can reject it. If the contract is not rejected, it remains a voidable contract that can be ratified.

When contract disputes arise, you need experienced legal representation and advice. Mestaz Law is a law firm focusing on commercial litigation and business divorce. Contact us at (602) 806-2068 and schedule a time to meet with us today.

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us, though doing so does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established. Our description of what we believe to be superior technology and how we win cases reflects our typical approach to litigation, which we believe:  (i) gives us a competitive advantage, and (ii) is responsible for any success we have had. But we do not win every case. Other lawyers may have technology or approaches that they believe gives them an advantage. Also, the results that we have obtained in other cases or that are described in our clients’ testimonials do not guarantee, promise, or predict the outcome of your case, which depends on the law, facts, and evidence specific to it.